Case workspaces, DeadEye Syndicate analysis, primary authority, operational developments, and selected firearms-industry intelligence—with source perspective and verification dates made visible.
Loading section…
Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF permanently enjoins enforcement of specified National Firearms Act provisions against defined plaintiffs and, where applicable, their members and customers. The relief is significant, but it is not a universal repeal of the NFA.
Selected current developments from government, primary, and industry sources. Perspective labels identify the source type; inclusion does not adopt every source's characterization.
Industry guidance emphasizes that the permanent injunction is operative but party-specific, and identifies unresolved implementation and appeal-period questions.
A current industry report on application volume and processing trends—relevant to dealers and applicants continuing to use the traditional NFA pathway.
The Justice Department's official announcement describes a package of final and proposed regulatory actions affecting owners and regulated businesses.
DOJ's official statement describes the federal litigation settlement and expressly leaves state-law restrictions as a separate inquiry.
The official bill history shows the proposal to repeal section 790.222 died in the Criminal Justice Subcommittee.
NSSF's national and state-level economic-impact report provides employment, wages, output, tax, and conservation-funding context.
Original documents supplied for direct review. Court and statutory text remain separate from DeadEye Syndicate commentary.
N.D. Tex. opinion and final judgment entered August 5, 2026. The attached reporter copy contains the court's analysis, injunction, covered provisions, seven-day stay, and judgment.
OPEN ↗02DEADEYE SYNDICATE ANALYSIS / DOCXThe Stay Is Over: What the NFA Injunction Now Means for FFLs NationwideAuthor analysis updated August 21, 2026. Separates injunction scope, covered transactions, Gun Control Act duties, state law, SOT status, and unresolved implementation questions.
OPEN ↗03DEADEYE SYNDICATE ANALYSIS / DOCXAnalysis of Forced-Reset TriggersFlorida-focused operational risk analysis addressing section 790.222, federal FRT developments, interstate transfers, and product-specific review.
OPEN ↗04STATUTE / PDFFlorida Statutes § 790.222Attached statutory text defining and prohibiting bump-fire stocks, current through the 2026 Regular Session in the supplied source.
OPEN ↗05COURT ORDER / PDFRoberts v. Swearingen — September 26, 2018 OrderOrder denying a temporary restraining order. The court did not enter a merits construction controlling modern FRTs.
OPEN ↗06COURT ORDER / PDFRoberts v. Swearingen — Disposition OrderOrder dismissing without prejudice for lack of standing. The record concerned a Slide Fire stock, modified hex bolt, and screwdriver—not a modern FRT model.
OPEN ↗Federal litigation is only one layer. Review state device restrictions, NFA treatment, business obligations, possession rules, and primary authority before relying on a federal development.